小爸爸
李强会见约旦国王阿卜杜拉二世_我的网站
一 |
When even major US allies and trading partners are swept into Washington's alleged China-linked transshipment network, is the US still cracking down on its so-called illegal tariff evasion, or is it raising its "small yard, high fence" higher and tighten it further by wielding its tariff stick and extending tariff controls across normal global supply chains?
The White House on Thursday released a report identifying roughly 40 economies as participants in what it calls a "Shadow Transshipment Network", alleging that Chinese goods are being routed through third countries to evade higher US tariffs. The list stretches across Asia, Europe and the Americas and includes some of Washington's closest allies and largest trading partners.
Chinese experts said the report is partly aimed at defending Washington's tariff policy by shifting responsibility for its weakened impact onto other economies, while also pressuring them to follow US trade and origin rules. In effect, the US is trying to extend its unilateral trade restrictions beyond its own borders and deeper into global supply chains, they said.
Build 'higher fence'
The 25-page report claims that US import sourcing saw a "substantial reallocation" after the 2018 tariffs, as China's direct share declined and imports from identified transshipment economies rose. It alleges that some goods were routed through lower-tariff jurisdictions, where minor processing, relabeling, repackaging, re-invoicing or paperwork changes were used to create the appearance of a new national origin.
However, the report itself acknowledges that alleged transshipment risks in several major economies are "embedded within broad legitimate trade flows." It also admitted that the post-2018 shift in US imports "does not establish" that all displaced Chinese trade was illegally transshipped and partly reflected "legitimate changes in production, investment, and sourcing."
False declarations of origin or simple repackaging can amount to tariff circumvention, but investing overseas, building factories abroad or sourcing components across borders are legitimate forms of supply-chain adjustment, experts said.
One purpose of the report is to portray Washington's tariff policy as effective while attributing its diminished impact to the responses of other economies, Zhou Mi, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, told the Global Times.
This allows Washington to shift responsibility onto other economies and put itself in a more favorable position in shaping the narrative around its tariff policy, Zhou said.
Cui Fan, a professor at the University of International Business and Economics, told the Global Times that US rules for determining country of origin are not fully aligned with those used by other economies. The latest move could pressure other countries to adopt US standards, but Cui said such an approach is unlikely to work.
"Countries formulate their rules of origin based on a range of factors, including the scale and technological conditions of their own industries," Cui said. "Industrial structures and the global division of labor cannot be reshaped simply through pressure from one country."
Harmonization of rules of origin - applying the same rules across countries regardless of purpose - "would facilitate the flow of international trade," according to WTO on its website.
It has also warned that misuse of such rules may turn them into "a trade policy instrument" rather than merely a device supporting other trade policy measures, according to WTO.
Washington was pursuing hegemonic politics and unilateral bullying in the economic and trade sphere under the guise of "reciprocity", a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce said when commenting on the US use of tariffs to pressure other countries into restricting economic and trade cooperation with China.
Disrupting global supply chains
Cui said production and trade networks linking China with South Korea, Europe and other economies have taken shape over years of market-driven specialization. By lowering production and logistics costs and improving efficiency, these networks have benefited businesses and consumers across participating economies.
"The real challenge facing global trade today is not so-called illegal transshipment, but the continued damage that unilateralism and trade protectionism are inflicting on the multilateral trading system," Cui added.
Since returning to office, the Trump administration has made tariffs a centerpiece of its trade policy, rolling out sweeping "reciprocal tariffs" and other broad duties that have drawn widespread criticism at home and abroad. On Thursday, Washington announced new Section 232 tariffs on drones and their parts and components, further expanding the range of products subject to US tariffs.
US tariffs have themselves pushed companies to reconfigure supply chains. Washington is now citing those very adjustments as evidence of circumvention, effectively using the market fallout from its own tariff policy to justify further trade restrictions, Chinese experts noted.
International trade is based on mutual benefit, and sovereign countries have the legitimate right to conduct economic and trade cooperation independently, Cui said. "No country should interfere with normal global trade simply to advance its own unilateral interests."
The report broadens its scrutiny beyond routing and documentation to include China-origin inputs or components, Chinese ownership or financing, relationships with Chinese suppliers or manufacturers, China-based production steps and China-origin routing histories.
Analysts believed the latest move is more than simply making the existing "high fence" higher. By trying to bring more economies and a larger portion of global supply chains within the reach of US tariff enforcement, Washington attempted to make the "yard" itself much bigger.
Cui warned that sustained US pressure to reshape normal trade and supply-chain links could fragment mature regional production networks, and reduce the efficiency of global resource allocation, with the impact extending far beyond China-US trade given the wide range of economies named in the report.
Zhou noted that companies would be forced to redesign supply chains to manage rising policy risks, adding costs that could feed back into the US through higher inflation while creating broader frictions and instability for global trade.
。 新华社北京8月24日电 8月24日上午，国务院总理李强在北京人民大会堂会见来华进行国事访问的约旦国王阿卜杜拉二世。 李强表示，近年来，在两国元首战略引领下，中约关系保持健康稳定发展，务实合作成果丰硕。
二 | 习近平主席将同国王陛下举行会谈，共同擘画中约关系发展新蓝图。明年中约将迎来建交50周年，中方愿同约方一道弘扬传统友好，增进政治互信，在涉及彼此核心利益问题上坚定相互支持，不断深化互利合作，在实现现代化的道路上携手前行。 李强指出，中方愿同约方加强发展对接，推动高质量共建“一带一路”，促进双边贸易扩容提质，拓展绿色能源、电动汽车、数字经济等科技和产业创新合作，取得更多实际成果，更好惠及两国人民。中国和约旦都有悠久的历史和文化，双方要加强文明交流互鉴，深化旅游、青年、媒体、地方等合作，不断增进国民相互理解和友谊。近段时期中东局势跌宕起伏，中方愿同约旦等有关方一道，为推动中东局势降温、实现长治久安作出不懈努力。
三 | 希望约方继续为中国和阿拉伯国家关系发展发挥重要作用，促进中阿集体合作迈上新台阶，构建更高水平的中阿命运共同体。
四 | 阿卜杜拉二世表示，中国是约旦的重要战略合作伙伴。当前两国关系发展势头良好，各领域合作持续深化。我将同习近平主席就两国关系发展深入交换意见，共同开启约中关系新篇章。
五 | 约方坚定奉行一个中国政策，认为台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分。约方愿以明年庆祝两国建交50周年为契机，同中方加强各层级往来，推进贸易、投资、农业、矿业、旅游等领域互利合作，开拓可再生能源、科技创新、人工智能等新兴领域合作。约方坚定支持习近平主席提出的四大全球倡议，期待同中方携手推动阿中关系迈上新水平。 吴政隆参加会见。【编辑:刘阳禾】。
六 |
Current article:http://6xd.choumaimuwogenkuzhainuan.bond/wmt/7mnc.html
Published on:03:49:54